Service Agreement Versus Lease

One indicator that is not subject to detailed scrutiny is whether the agreement contains a fixed payment element structured to reimburse the supplier for the cost of the asset contained. Many service contracts entail significant start-up costs, whether they are the costs of acquiring assets for the provision of the service or of personnel and training service providers. Therefore, it is not uncommon for a contract to include a number of funding mechanisms to ensure the reimbursement of these costs, whether the mechanism is defined as a form of payment for the availability of assets or simply as a minimum duration of a service contract, in order to ensure that the supplier receives a certain amount of payments. In the case of a solar energy installation, a typical electricity acceptance contract requires the lessee to acquire all of the power produced and the provider`s objective is to provide as much electricity as possible in order to maximize its turnover. As a general rule, the beneficiary does not have the right to purchase electricity from the establishment. Where a lease is very clear because it is a physical asset, a service contract is a little different. If you empty a computer for 12 months, the owner only has to give you the computer and collect their payments. However, if you ask someone to maintain your computer for 12 months, you need to make sure that you define everything – the service they offer, the criteria by which their quality of service is evaluated and when it should be done. This is due to the fact that you must attribute material qualities to intangible services. If the agreement is documented as a lease, it is clearly a leasing for accounting purposes and, depending on the profitability, it may be a loan for legal and tax purposes. Tenants could choose not to separate the elements of the contract and treat the entire contract as a single lease.

For legal reasons, most lawyers want the asset to be rented to be explicitly indicated so that the lessor can perfect as much as possible its security interest in the asset by filing the necessary pledge statements. These deposits serve to register the pledged asset with the competent authorities, so that the user cannot inappropriately transfer it to another party in a transaction that can be complied with by the courts. In other words, if a buyer acquires an asset in good faith from a seller and the buyer has no reason to believe that the seller does not own the asset, the transfer may be respected by the courts and the true owner may have little recourse to recover the asset from the buyer. Assuming that an asset generates some form of benefit that can be measured economically. for example, a railway car is used to move grain and the contractor pays for the movement of grain on the basis of the cargoes being transported. The economic benefits of the rail car are represented by the revenue generated for the relocation of these grains. The party receiving payment for the shipment is the service provider and determines the resources to be used to move the grain. If, in the course of his duties, the supplier withdraws a contract for the use of railcars and also assumes the obligation to pay for the hire of the wagons, the contract between him and the lessor is a financial lease, even if the lease agreement contains certain maintenance elements.

Article 7701(e) of the IRC contains a number of non-exclusive factors that concern all service contracts, with the exception of those that are treated as exceptions, for example.B. service contracts as for alternative energy installations and water treatment plants, which are dealt with by four slightly more flexible factors, in accordance with the provisions of IRC ยง 7701 (3 and 4). Note that the tests are about integrating an asset into the agreement. . . .

Comments are closed.